Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/02/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Digital M - was Leica to Restructure, Cut Staff
From: Dan C <leicaman@sympatico.ca>
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2004 18:58:44 -0500
References: <200402080539.VAA04340@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> <1076274787.5801.2.camel@creo_pc3>

But what is wrong with speculating about what a possible future Leica may
entail?    Is it any worse than talking about whiskey or fountain pens or
hats?  This list would be dead if it wern't for these kinds of posts.
There's always the delete key, or email filter if they really bother you.

- -dan c.

At 02:18 PM 08-02-04 -0800, Ted Grant wrote:
>Subject: RE: [Leica] Digital M - was Leica to Restructure, Cut Staff
>
>You know the most interesting thing about this announcement?
>
>Are all the list members hypothetical possibilities of what it might or
>might not be. It's the amazing versions of worries to and fro, buy not buy,
>wait and see, buy right away, ordered already! ;-) And will never buy! And
>questions beyond imagination.
[snip]
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] Digital M - was Leica to Restructure, Cut Staff)
In reply to: Message from "Jim Shulman" <jshul@comcast.net> (RE: [Leica] Digital M - was Leica to Restructure, Cut Staff)
Message from Feli di Giorgio <feli@creocollective.com> (RE: [Leica] Digital M - was Leica to Restructure, Cut Staff)