Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/02/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] 40mm Rokkor CLE...Two Mints in One!
From: Jeffery Smith <jls@runbox.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2004 10:06:12 -0600
References: <001401c3ed85$bbe29d90$b2710e44@newukolbqveo9i> <000001c3ed8e$6baee9b0$121afea9@Hausner>

I used to think it meant "uncirculated". The bar has been lowered 
considerably lately.

At 09:23 AM 2/7/2004, you wrote:

>Well, in that case, I guess it is acceptable to be "sort of unique,"
>"more unique," "less unique," et cetera.  To me, "mint" means as the
>item came from the manufacturer...or the mint...having had absolutely no
>use whatsoever.  That is, unless one really does mean derived from the
>essential oils of the spearmint and peppermint families of plants.
>Everything else is just sloppy language usage or the misrepresentation
>of goods on offer.
>
>         Buzz Hausner
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Jeffery
>Smith
>Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 9:22 AM
>To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>Subject: RE: [Leica] 40mm Rokkor CLE...Two Mints in One!
>
>In KEH terms, mint doesn't mean like new...there are several categories
>above it, like "New" "As New" "Like New" and "Like New Minus". What
>really annoys me that, to some folks, "Excellent" means "average" as in
>well used but no major dings.
>
>Jeffery Smith
>New Orleans, LA
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Buzz
>Hausner
>Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 2:39 AM
>To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>Subject: [Leica] 40mm Rokkor CLE...Two Mints in One!
>
>I'm sorry...and not that the referenced lens isn't a very fine
>unit...but what is better than mint?  Perhaps the collection of
>photographica has progressed to the level of numismatics, in which there
>seem to be near infinite levels of "mint" state.  Maybe by "mint or
>better" you mean something like chocolate.
>
>         Buzz Hausner
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of John Abela
>Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 11:14 PM
>To: LUG
>Subject: [Leica] WTB: Mint 40mm Rokkor CLE
>
>Hello,
>Anyone want to part with their mint or better 40mm rokkor CLE? Thanks.
>Regards,
>John
>
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Brian Reid <reid@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> (RE: [Leica] 40mm Rokkor CLE...Two Mints in One!)
In reply to: Message from "Jeffery Smith" <jls@runbox.com> (RE: [Leica] 40mm Rokkor CLE...Two Mints in One!)
Message from "Buzz Hausner" <buzz.hausner@verizon.net> (RE: [Leica] 40mm Rokkor CLE...Two Mints in One!)