Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/02/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: RE:[Leica] Leica R lens question
From: Teresa299@aol.com
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 13:34:58 EST

In a message dated 2/4/04 8:35:20 AM, tedgrant@shaw.ca writes:

<< Signature, bokeh and some of the other twiddly items that come to surface

every once in awhile are meaningless if the content is a piece of crap to

start off with. No matter if it has the "most beautiful bokeh" in the world

it doesn't make a great and memorable photograph if the subject is lying

there like water on a plate. >>

oh ted.

of course we're talking proper composition.  but just how artists in other 
realms might use acrylic or other oil or encaustic, the choice of lens can make 
a difference.  a fascinating subject, with great composition might look 
different as shot with a noctilux vs. a pinhole.  I wasn't asking the question about 
toys, or what alligator treatment I should cover my camera with, it was 
asking those who see a difference in a painters palette, what their observations 
were.

but the very question might be the difference between a photojournalist type 
versus an admitted quiche eater like myself.


- -kim

who also can taste the difference in various cheese, chocolate and wine as 
well.  
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> (Re: RE:[Leica] Leica R lens question)