Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/02/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Frank
I'll bet Barcelona is nicer than Cedar Rapids right now. ;-)
I did the comparison years ago when George Lepp of Outdoor Photography had
a work shop in Dallas. The work shop was sponsored by Canon - Big Surprise
- - So I got to play with all of the EOS-1 cameras and lenses. I will say I
love the fast super teles for convenience and easy visualization when
compared to the slower Telyt. I went home thinking of how I could convince
my wife I needed to buy the 280/2.8 from Leica. ;-) Didn't Work, Darn. ;-(
As a after note, George was quite impressed with the size of the 560, it is
a long optic.
Gene
frank.dernie@btinternet.com
Sent by: To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
owner-leica-users@mejac.palo cc:
-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica R lens question
02/04/2004 05:03 AM
Please respond to
leica-users
That is interesting, I have not compared the 560 f6.8 I shall do so when I
get home - I am in Barcelona on business at the moment.
Frank
> from: grduprey@rockwellcollins.com
> date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 18:38:40
> to: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> subject: Re: [Leica] Leica R lens question
>
>
>
>
>
> I compared the Canon 500/4 to my 560/6.8 Telyt and there was no
comparison
> the 560 won easily, my wife's opinion, by the way without knowing which
was
> which.
>
> Gene
>
>
>
>
> Frank Dernie
> <Frank.Dernie@btinternet.com To:
leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> > cc:
> Sent by: Subject: Re:
[Leica] Leica R lens question
> owner-leica-users@mejac.palo
> -alto.ca.us
>
>
> 02/02/2004 07:46 PM
> Please respond to
> leica-users
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I became a little disappointed by my 280 f2,8 after I treated myself to
> a 500 f4 Canon. I know it is much more recent but it is very noticeably
> superior in sharpness and boke.
> Frank
>
> On Monday, February 2, 2004, at 09:21 pm, grduprey@rockwellcollins.com
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > For me the 90/2.8 Elmarit, the 560/6.8 are excellent. I would also
> > have to
> > say the 100/2.8 Macro, and the 280/2.8 are at the top of the list.
> >
> > Gene
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html