Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/02/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] digital in low light
From: "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 08:39:39 +0100
References: <152.29b08df6.2d4d03bc@aol.com> <00cd01c3e84d$f159b5e0$388a8418@symkeehx5nw8g8> <401C561E.4020704@wanadoo.nl> <11931990-5464-11D8-89A9-0050E42E6E0B@shaw.ca> <1075607857.18186.47.camel@creo_pc3> <401D1620.5030606@osheaven.net> <EBDBB269-54D1-11D8-8FF8-000A958F513A@jphotog.com> <401DFA7C.5020205@osheaven.net> <093E50AF-558F-11D8-8FF8-000A958F513A@jphotog.com> <Pine.SOL.4.58-L.0402030829220.4517@hedvig.uio.no> <D7FC4774-5658-11D8-A0C4-000A958F513A@jphotog.com>

back to film?
http://www.wisner.com/freedom.htm
simon

> The D10 and D60 and D300 all use the exact same CMOS chip. I'm not sure 
> about the
> G5, though I doubt it. I have a G3 and it's MUCH noisier than the 
> DSLRs. I bought a D300 because it was such a good deal I couldn't pass 
> it up. But in the long run, I'll get either the D10 or the 1D Mark II.
> 
> It's still pretty accepted most places I've read the Canon CMOS chips 
> are better than Nikon in noise. And now with the D1 Mark II, 
> performance has surpassed Nikon's CCD chips as well. But in the end, I 
> don't think you could go wrong with either system. And I bet whatever 
> Leica comes out with will be just as good too in real terms. Noise is 
> also a function of software. And there is software coming in the market 
> to reduce noise post-exposure.
> 
> Anyway, I think we ought to steer back to Leica talk. :-)
> 
> Eric
> Carlsbad, CA
> 
> A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by 
> little statesmen, philosophers, and divines. - Ralph Waldo Emerson
> On Feb 2, 2004, at 11:33 PM, Daniel Ridings wrote:
> 
> > Do the low-end Canons (10D is the lowest I want to go, I think) now 
> > allow
> > exposure indexes higher than 1600?
> >
> > Does the G5 use a CMOS chip like the DSLR's (not the same, but same 
> > family
> > of technology)?
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Eric Welch <eric@jphotog.com> (Re: [Leica] digital in low light)
In reply to: Message from Teresa299@aol.com (Re: [Leica] Fw: [Large Format] Beth Keiser Shoots B&W 4x5 ForCampaign Coverage)
Message from "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl> ([Leica] digital in low light)
Message from Michiel Fokkema <michiel.fokkema@wanadoo.nl> (Re: [Leica] digital in low light)
Message from John Collier <jbcollier@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] digital in low light)
Message from Feli di Giorgio <feli@creocollective.com> (Re: [Leica] digital in low light)
Message from sam <sam@osheaven.net> (Re: [Leica] digital in low light)
Message from Eric Welch <eric@jphotog.com> (Re: [Leica] digital in low light)
Message from sam <sam@osheaven.net> (Re: [Leica] digital in low light)
Message from Eric Welch <eric@jphotog.com> (Re: [Leica] digital in low light)
Message from Daniel Ridings <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no> (Re: [Leica] digital in low light)
Message from Eric Welch <eric@jphotog.com> (Re: [Leica] digital in low light)