Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/01/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] digital in low light
From: Michiel Fokkema <>
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2004 02:27:58 +0100
References: <> <00cd01c3e84d$f159b5e0$388a8418@symkeehx5nw8g8>

Hello Animal,

I suspect you live in Holland. If yes please buy the last 'Camera 
magazine'. Erwin Puts explains that no digicam is even close to slow film.
As far as I know standard film can easily get a resolution compared to a 
20mp digicam.

Best regards,

Michiel Fokkema

animal wrote:

> Hi from what i read every where,a 10+megapixel camera will do better
> resolution wise then a slow film.
> Do any of you know of a link or publication   that explains at what iso the
> crossover is to 35mm,s film better performance.
> A  friend of mine who does pro sport showed me some low light stuff made
> with his top Canon and it was allmost scary.
> Please tell me there is some use left in my Noctilux.
> Thanks
> simon jessurun
> p.s not that i will ever sell it or the M3 that was adjusted for it
> --
> To unsubscribe, see
- --
To unsubscribe, see

Replies: Reply from JCB <> ([Leica] Re: digital in low light)
Reply from John Collier <> (Re: [Leica] digital in low light)
In reply to: Message from (Re: [Leica] Fw: [Large Format] Beth Keiser Shoots B&W 4x5 ForCampaign Coverage)
Message from "animal" <> ([Leica] digital in low light)