Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2004/02/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] digital in low light
From: Clive Moss <chmphoto@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 22:40:40 -0600
References: <152.29b08df6.2d4d03bc@aol.com> <00cd01c3e84d$f159b5e0$388a8418@symkeehx5nw8g8> <401C561E.4020704@wanadoo.nl> <11931990-5464-11D8-89A9-0050E42E6E0B@shaw.ca> <1075607857.18186.47.camel@creo_pc3> <401D1620.5030606@osheaven.net> <EBDBB269-54D1-11D8-8FF8-000A958F513A@jphotog.com> <401DFA7C.5020205@osheaven.net> <401E5C3A.6070408@sbcglobal.net> <401EC5D5.9020506@osheaven.net>
sam wrote:
> Clive, I think I'm going to drop out of the film vs digital thread.
...
Digital vs. film is a pointless topic indeed. Sort of like oil painting
vs watercolor. They can both make images. They are different.
I was commenting on the pointlessness of comparing 4x5 with sub 35mm --
whatever the recording medium. Now -- what size should the megium be?
those threads have been going on for decades :-)
- --
Clive Moss
http://clive.moss.net
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
In reply to:
Message from Teresa299@aol.com (Re: [Leica] Fw: [Large Format] Beth Keiser Shoots B&W 4x5 ForCampaign Coverage)
Message from "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl> ([Leica] digital in low light)
Message from Michiel Fokkema <michiel.fokkema@wanadoo.nl> (Re: [Leica] digital in low light)
Message from John Collier <jbcollier@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] digital in low light)
Message from Feli di Giorgio <feli@creocollective.com> (Re: [Leica] digital in low light)
Message from sam <sam@osheaven.net> (Re: [Leica] digital in low light)
Message from Eric Welch <eric@jphotog.com> (Re: [Leica] digital in low light)
Message from sam <sam@osheaven.net> (Re: [Leica] digital in low light)
Message from Clive Moss <chmphoto@sbcglobal.net> (Re: [Leica] digital in low light)
Message from sam <sam@osheaven.net> (Re: [Leica] digital in low light)