Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/01/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Fw: [LargeFormat] Beth Keiser Shoots B&W 4x5 For Campaign Coverage
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:13:30 -0500

The question isn't whether the "print" is worthy of preserving - the
question is whether the image that's printed is worthy of preserving.
;-) I'll take the lousiest HCB print any day over the best master print
of a mundane image by some John Doe who's known for his glorious prints.


B. D.

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of sam
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 1:44 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] Fw: [LargeFormat] Beth Keiser Shoots B&W 4x5 For
Campaign Coverage


Beth Keiser has become a minor hero of mine. Reminds me of the fellow 
who wondered aloud during an aggressive "are digital prints archival" 
debate, how many of the people involved in the debate could produce even

one print that is worthy of lasting; and then suggested that 
non-archival prints might well be a bessing for furture peoples.

Sam S



animal wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jim Hemenway" <Jim@hemenway.com>
> To: "Large Format Group" <largeformat@f32.net>; "BigNeg Group"
> <bigneg@topica.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 3:22 PM
> Subject: [LargeFormat] Beth Keiser Shoots B&W 4x5 For Campaign
Coverage
> 
> 
> 
> http://www.pdnonline.com/photodistrictnews/headlines/article_display.j
> sp?vnu_content_id=2071563
> 
>>Jim - http://www.hemenway.com
>>
>>

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html