Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/01/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I believe he means T-Max 3200. Sam S B. D. Colen wrote: > Don't you mean Ilford Delta 3200? There's Tri-X is a 400 - or 320 - asa > film. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Steve > Barbour > Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 7:02 PM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: RE: [Leica] TriX 3200 at 1600/was TriX at 800 > > > on a related issue...for shooting... in available darkness, how > about Tri X 3200 shot at 1600 and processed normal...I have been told > this works great... very fast, with good results... anybody > know?.....good way to get you to 1600 ?...Steve > > > >>Very true. >> >>======================================= >>I have heard that chromogenic films like XP2 is captured better by >>scanners compared to silver based films. Don't know how true this is. >> >>Dan K. >> >>At 04:50 AM 1/27/04, you wrote: >> >>>What are you scanning with? My Minolta Scan Dual II chokes on Tri-X >>>and >> >>>spews out blotchy scans. Some weird reaction of the scanner res and >>>the >> >>>grain pattern in Tri-X. Everything else scans fine. Too bad Tri-X is >>>my >> >>>B&W film of choice! >>> >>>John Collier >>> >>>On Jan 26, 2004, at 12:36 PM, Adam Bridge wrote: >>> >>> >>>>I did some playing with Tri-X at 800 and 1600. >>> >>>-- >>>To unsubscribe, see >>>http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>-- >>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html >> >> >>-- >>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html