Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/01/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Kodak 400TCN
From: "eric" <leica_korenman@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 22:42:36 -0500
References: <p06020400bc2b99c59d55@[68.106.255.242]> <001201c3db0a$f62ce880$665c6244@ph.cox.net>

shot at 800 the negs are quite thin.
I prefer 320.

good luck,
Eric

- --------------------------------------------------
www.faneuil.net

- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Barbour" <kididdoc@cox.net>
To: "LUG" <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 8:57 PM
Subject: [Leica] Kodak 400TCN


> a very lovely image Eric. please tell me... do you always develop as
> if it was shot at 400....?    Can you shoot at 800 and develop at 400
> with good results?
> 
> thanks,  Steve
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "eric (by way of Steve Barbour)" <leica_korenman@hotmail.com>
> To: "Steve Barbour" <kididdoc@cox.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 6:13 PM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Kodak 400TCN
> 
> 
> | TCN is my B&W film of choice to scan.
> | Gorgeous skin tones. Can be shot at 50-800 ASA.
> | I prefer 320.
> | http://www.faneuil.net/year%202002/week32.htm
> |
> | Eric
> |
> | --------------------------------------------------
> | www.faneuil.net
> |
> | ----- Original Message -----
> | From: "Bill Lawlor" <wvl@infinex.com>
> | To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> | Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 6:10 PM
> | Subject: [Leica] Re: Kodak 400TCN
> |
> |
> | >
> | >
> | >  I think TCN is not a bad substitute for TriX if printed properly.
> There is
> | >  a lab near San Francisco that will print it on Agfa b&w silver
> paper. I
> | >  think the results are much better than prints on color paper. On
> silver
> | >  paper the full tonal range comes across. They will print matte or
> glossy
> | >  with borders and full-frame on 4X6 or larger. I shot five rolls
> at a
> | >  friend's wedding last summer and the couple was very happy. It
> makes me
> | >  want to fill the trays and go into the dark again.
> | >  Bill Lawlor
> | >  .................................
> | >
> | >  "I have settled on T400CN because my local processor prints the
> 6x4's on
> | Agfa
> | >  colour paper and it prints almost true b&w. It also scans as b&w,
> unlike
> | the
> | >  Portra which comes out blue.
> | >
> | >  I never print any images I just post to the web so I have no
> experience of
> | >  how it will look when enlarged. How much do I like Kodak T400CN?
> I just
> | >  bought 40 rolls of it.
> | >
> | >  Sorry again for the confusion and thanks for looking.
> | >
> | >
> | >  Graham
> | >  "
> | >
> | >
> | >  --
> | >  To unsubscribe, see
> http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> | >
> | --
> | To unsubscribe, see
> http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> 
> 
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.560 / Virus Database: 352 - Release Date: 1/8/04
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> 
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Steve Barbour" <kididdoc@cox.net> ([Leica] Kodak 400TCN)