Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: DoF, was: Noctilux-M v. Summilux-R
From: "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 19:42:35 +0100
References: <002901c3cce1$d80e9c90$388a8418@symkeehx5nw8g8> <20031227201539.78162.qmail@web40909.mail.yahoo.com> <000f01c3ccc9$777428e0$87d86c18@gv.shawcable.net> <002901c3cce1$d80e9c90$388a8418@symkeehx5nw8g8> <5.1.1.6.2.20031228094538.03e28e98@mail.brick.org>

Why ?they are not inaccuat are they?
regards
simon j
- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "JCB" <jcb@visualimpressions.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2003 6:48 PM
Subject: [Leica] Re: DoF, was: Noctilux-M v. Summilux-R


> I bought these books when they first were published. What a waste of
money!
>
> JB
>
>
> At 02:54 AM 12/28/2003 -0600, Elaine -HFB- Ashton wrote:
>
> >animal [s.jessurun95@chello.nl] quoth:
> >*>>
> >*>I found a nice explanation of the topic in the in and out of focus book
by
> >*>Merklinger which is available for download as a pdf file.
> >*>
> >*>p.s.
> >*>Sorry for not including a link to the book but my mouse failed and am
> >*>relearning keystroke navigation
> >
> >http://www.trenholm.org/hmmerk/#TIAOOF
> >
> >e.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl> (Re: [Leica] DoF, was: Noctilux-M v. Summilux-R)
Message from Lee <leeh0@yahoo.com> (Re: [Leica] DoF, was: Noctilux-M v. Summilux-R)
Message from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] DoF, was: Noctilux-M v. Summilux-R)
Message from "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl> (Re: [Leica] DoF, was: Noctilux-M v. Summilux-R)
Message from JCB <jcb@visualimpressions.com> ([Leica] Re: DoF, was: Noctilux-M v. Summilux-R)