Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Fw: looking for line pairs with a stabiliser and a Leica and question
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 16:45:51 -0500

And, just out of curiosity, this has what to do with photography or any
real world use of Leica equipment? Just wondering. ;-)

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of animal
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2003 3:58 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: [Leica] Fw: looking for line pairs with a stabiliser and a
Leica and question


Sorry for the earlier empty post.
Here goes.
A collegue and myself wanted to find out if we could get 80 line pairs
per millimeter using a Leica and a Kenyon gyro stabiliser. We could not
find those data in literature so last night, while also doing a test of
Laphroig versus Lagavullin, we decided to give it a try ourselves.

We scribbled some lines on a piece of paper with a group of line pairs
one 1 cm per pair and the other 5 mm per pair. With a Noctilux 18 meters
away we calculated the image on the film to be 36 and 72 line pairs per
millimeter. We suspended the camera and running gyro from a bungee cord
and started. First exposure was at 1/250 second and f1.0 going in stops
to 1 second and f16.0.

Then we tried the same sequence while handholding the camera and bracing
ourselves in a doorway.

By then we became to doubt the ability of a 4000 dpi scanner to resolve
our results. While one would assume that 4000 dpi translates to 80 line
pairs per millimeter,some knowledgeable people we asked suggested that
60lp/mm is about the best such a scanner can do. So we had to aim a
little lower and did the same test with an aasummicron90 mm and the
stabiliser starting at 1/60 and f2.0  .

Although our test was hastily done it still yielded some suprises to us.
The biggest being that the stabiliser clearly is able to permit shots at
1 second. Others were that the noctilux was still giving good results at
f 4.0 and 5.6 and stayed that way until f16.(we realise that the focus
shift of the lens could have been to our advantage at those apertures if
we started out with a focus error). Also suprising was that at f 8.0 and
smaller the summicron image is starting to fade. Lastly it shows that it
is hard to find the testcard when handholding the camera. On the page
the first column is the stabilised noctilux the second is the same
handheld(stopping at 1/8th) and the last is the summicron. The film used
was Kodak E100 GX . The  question is to get rid of focusing errors .can
one set the lens accurately at infinity just by putting the index on
thatmarkingAnd if so at what distance would one have to put the target?
http://www.leica-gallery.net/apekop/folder-6004.html
best regards
simon jessurun

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl> (Re: [Leica] Fw: looking for line pairs with a stabiliser and a Leica and question)