Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Why is the IIIg so much more expensive?
From: John Collier <jbcollier@shaw.ca>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 13:39:33 -0700
References: <a02010001-1032-209DD0CE325E11D88BD8000393D465D8@[10.0.1.3]>

I would get a Pentax Spotmatic (or similar) with the TM42 mount. Lenses 
are plentiful and cheap and if anything breaks you just buy another. If 
you want a rangefinder it is hard to beat a Bessa R.

John Collier

On Dec 19, 2003, at 1:01 PM, Adam Bridge wrote:

> The IIIg question came up because I was looking for a small, entirely 
> manual
> camera for a "youngster" who was interested in learning black and white
> photography and has some dollars to spend toward that end but not 
> enough for an
> M. (I didn't feel like loaning one of mine.)
>
> A IIIf was in the right price range with a reasonable piece of glass 
> and a light
> meter.
>
> An automatic camera doesn't seem like a good learning tool because 
> it's too darn
> easy to just flick it into auto mode and be done with it and then you 
> haven't
> had to do the thinking required. After you have learned that THEN you 
> can fall
> back and use automatic features.
>
> That's sorta how I think about it anyhow.
>
> A low-end used SLR would work too, of course, but I think there's 
> something to
> be said for using a range finder and learning to work within the 
> boundaries of a
> single lens (and a single kind of film too for that matter.)

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Adam Bridge <abridge@mac.com> (Re: [Leica] Why is the IIIg so much more expensive?)