Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The body and lens dimensions look so very M rangefinder. So again - Why can't they design a digital M body? I know it has been discussed at length about angles of incidence and sensors not up to the task - but what is so different about the digilux 2 that precludes designing a body to accept M lenses? Eric - -------------------------------------------------- www.faneuil.net - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Frank Dernie" <Frank.Dernie@btinternet.com> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2003 12:39 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica Digilux 2, again > Nothing as far as I can see - do you mean the anti flare baffling? > > On Saturday, December 13, 2003, at 05:18 pm, Christopher Williams > wrote: > > > What's up with that front element? > > > > http://www.dpreview.com/news/0312/digilux2p2/allroundview.jpg > > > > Chris > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html