Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] #$@%$^ art photographers
From: Daniel Ridings <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 15:19:39 +0100 (MET)
References: <BCEKKGNGDPMOIPMEJONBKEAFDFAA.phong@doan-ltd.com>

> There is art, and there is the business of art.  If the public is
> stupid enough to pay for the art, don't blame only the artist.
> And I don't think artists would treat you as ignorant Philistine
> just because you don't like their art.  Just don't put down something
> you don't understand.  You put them down, or they think you might put
> them down, and they'll treat you as ignorant Philistine.

As an aside ... Denmark has come upon a wonderful system for supporting
the arts. They used to pay a subsidy to artists so they could get by. You
can guess that such a system can get out of hand and is prone to cronyism
(who is to say who is an artist who needs to be supported?)

So they replaced it with tax deductions for businesses who _buy_ art from
artists. This incentive makes businesses positive to the idea of buying
art (they can deduct the outlay) and since the artist is making money, the
government doesn't have to hassle with grants.

It _does_ mean that artists have to produce works that people want. I
really don't see anything wrong with that.

Daniel
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Jim Hemenway <Jim@hemenway.com> (Re: [Leica] #$@%$^ art photographers)
In reply to: Message from "Phong" <phong@doan-ltd.com> (RE: [Leica] #$@%$^ art photographers)