Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: TheLEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced)
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 05:00:50 -0800
References: <p05100318bbf5b1770ab5@[10.0.1.5]> <r01050300-0921-F650A781263611D88AC25C10A1E6DFE0@[66.239.168.2]> <22575221-26C8-11D8-8437-000A958F513A@jphotog.com> <p05100318bbf5b1770ab5@[10.0.1.5]> <5.2.1.1.2.20031205000144.0e4227c8@192.168.100.11>

"Richard F. Man" wrote:
> 
> At 10:53 PM 12/4/2003 -0800, Eric Welch wrote:
> >No, that's the whole point of RAW, the image is straight from the sensor,
> >no processing. Other than to create the RAW file format. No sharpening, no
> >color correction, no filtering.
> >...
> 
> Ahh.... I'm not an expert on this, but "raw" is not raw since the camera
> needs to color interpolate the sensor data, if nothing else?
> 
"Raw seems less raw than Nikons NEF which is their Raw. And in which you
can adjust the white point and EV's as if you were just taking the
picture. Only you are at your computer dealing with an image which you'd
taken in the past. To me that's pretty amazing. And a bummer Photoshop
can't save it back into that format.

Mark Rabiner
Portland, Oregon USA
http://www.rabinergroup.com

No Archive
Hold the Anchovies
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Eric Welch <eric@jphotog.com> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: TheLEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))
In reply to: Message from Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))
Message from George Lottermoser <imagist@imagist.cnc.net> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))
Message from Eric Welch <eric@jphotog.com> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))
Message from Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))
Message from "Richard F. Man" <richard-lists@imagecraft.com> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))