Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Panasonic DMC-FZ10 with Vario-Elmarit lens
From: RUBEN BLĘDEL <ruben@rhodos.dk>
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 18:42:59 +0100
References: <337A538C-2256-11D8-B2BF-0003938C439E@btinternet.com> <3FCAC07A.212884F4@rabinergroup.com> <3FCADC5E.496AA012@pacbell.net> <3FCAFFF3.F9F25BD@rabinergroup.com> <3FCB0F5F.5030502@rhodos.dk> <3F409E2C-240D-11D8-A34C-000A958F513A@jphotog.com>

Eric
I have no problem with phoshop at all - I use photoshop daily and I can 
not stand being in a darkroom. The photographers I was refering to  has 
not been comfortable with the process of  looking over all the shots on 
a computer and post-processing, retouching them and having the full 
responsibility of their cmyk values etc. - some of them are very skilled 
and still very popular photgraphers, creating some amazing pictures but 
they just dont like working digital. I am planing on going for the imcon 
ixpress next year for alle the fine-art i shoot at museums. But before I 
am up and running with a set up that satisfy my demands with a 
calibrated printer that match the digital approval printer at my 
printer, a dedicated workstation with a calibrated monitor, a portable 
labtop, and adapters for both fuji and hasselblad  im getting close to 
35-40.000 usd. As I am often both doing the photography and using it for 
the books and catalogs I publish  I don have anybody but my selv pushing 
me to go digital so I am not forced into a premature and more expensive 
solutuion.

Regards

Ruben

Eric Welch wrote:

> Ruben,
>
> And how does sending your work to a lab any more "photographer-like" 
> than doing it in a darkroom or in Photoshop?
>
> I guess it all has to do with where the creativity in the job is, 
> right? And then picking the tools to do it more efficiently.
>
> Maybe there could be a market for Photoshop artists who can do custom 
> work for clients they get to know just like a custom lab. In the end, 
> a lab print can never be as "precisely perfect" as a real photo (I'm 
> not talking inkjet prints here) that's been through the hands of a 
> skilled Photoshop user. There is so much more fine control. I think 
> the issue of quality lies there and not on which inkjet printer is the 
> best. And in the future, custom labs will change the back end, but 
> still offer essentially the same services. Just with different 
> equipment to serve the needs of commercial/portrait/too- 
> busy-to-print-their-own photographers.
>
> On Dec 1, 2003, at 1:52 AM, RUBEN BLĘDEL wrote:
>
>> they dont whant to suffer countless hours in front of phoshop " they 
>> want to be photographers
>
>
> Eric Welch
> Carlsbad, CA
> http://www.jphotog.com
>
> "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds.  The 
> pessimist fears it is true."  -J. Robert Oppenheimer
>
> -- 
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Frank Dernie <Frank.Dernie@btinternet.com> (Re: [Leica] Panasonic DMC-FZ10 with Vario-Elmarit lens)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> (Re: [Leica] Panasonic DMC-FZ10 with Vario-Elmarit lens)
Message from Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net> (Re: [Leica] Panasonic DMC-FZ10 with Vario-Elmarit lens)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> (Re: [Leica] Panasonic DMC-FZ10 with Vario-Elmarit lens)
Message from RUBEN BLĘDEL <ruben@rhodos.dk> (Re: [Leica] Panasonic DMC-FZ10 with Vario-Elmarit lens)
Message from Eric Welch <eric@jphotog.com> (Re: [Leica] Panasonic DMC-FZ10 with Vario-Elmarit lens)