Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/10/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Anyone been using the DiMAGE 5400?
From: "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 22:48:31 +0200
References: <r02000200-1028-FD7A2869FE8411D7986D000393D465D8@[10.0.1.3]>

Allways thought that it,s vital to adjust the histogram before scanning.
Simon j
- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Adam Bridge" <abridge@mac.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 10:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Anyone been using the DiMAGE 5400?


> On 2003-10-14 jorge@jorgemtrevino.com (Jorge M. TreviƱo) thoughtfully
wrote:
>
> >http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=0063qZ
> >http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=0064L1
>
> Anyone who declares the user interface experience of SilverFast to be
"superb"
> is automatically suspect in my mind.
>
> I'm curious about the posting because it seems that many people want their
> scanner software to do what Photoshop can also do. I don't think there's
any
> gain in manipulating the image by the scanner software as opposed to
Photoshop.
> I'll except Digital ICE.
>
> Adam
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Adam Bridge <abridge@mac.com> (Re: [Leica] Anyone been using the DiMAGE 5400?)