Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/10/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Unfortunately, I'm now using Hotmail for e-mails. The way it's currently set up, this message comes across as a complete non sequitor. Is it a response to a previous post or photograph? It seems not, at least according to the subject line, and the fact the the post in and of itself refers to no previous writings. However, the context of some of the replies seems to indicate that we're talking about a particular image. If so, could some one clue me in, as I can make neither heads nor tails of this discussion. thanks, frank "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer >From: Afterswift@aol.com >Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >CC: quiltwrite@comcast.net (ajs) >Subject: [Leica] The Imprimatur of a Photograph >Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 16:28:07 EDT > >Ladies and Gentlemen, > >Just because an image contains photographic components in various >modifications or from diverse sources or times, those elements don't give >that image the >imprimatur of a photograph. Just MHO. > >br >-- >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html _________________________________________________________________ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html