Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/10/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Sort of like "guilty by reason of insanity". That was announced on the local news here a few years back, and nobody questioned it. Jeffery At 12:01 PM 10/7/2003 -0700, you wrote: >On 10/7/03 9:28 AM, "Adam Bridge" <abridge@mac.com> wrote: > > > > > They SHOULD! Any potential juror should see the defendent as innocent until > > the > > defense proves beyond reasonable doubt that he is guilty. > > >I'm assuming that the above is a typo? > >Bryan > >-- >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html