Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/10/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Arnold Actions : Monday
From: Jeffery Smith <jls@runbox.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 20:41:25 -0500
References: <001601c38c46$733999e0$d271fea9@ccasony01> <002501c38c43$2e7653f0$6401a8c0@lan.artvader.com>

Clinton's a liar
Arnold's a liar
Rush is saying that he will ultimately tell us the truth. That leaves him 
free to lie until then.
Boy, I love freedom of speech!!

Jeffery


At 07:17 PM 10/6/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>At 04:14 PM 10/6/03 -0400, bdcolen wrote:
> >I know of no one who defended Bill Clinton's actions - the only question
> >about his behavior was whether it rose to the level of being an
> >impeachable offense.
>
>BD
>
>No.  Bill Clinton was NOT impeached for having had sexual relations with
>Monica Lewinsky.  He was indicted for TELLING FALSEHOODS about it.  He
>lied, and was impeached, and the Senate refused to remove him.  (Which, in
>the end, would have allowed the AlGorithm to run  as an incumbent in 2000
>but, then, I suspect that your common sense comprehends what a disaster
>Gore would have been to our national governance.)
>
>Clinton's problem was not with his womanizing but with his HONESTY.  He was
>a flagrant liar.  By the way, you have opined, over the years, that
>"lawyers lie when they flap their lips".  If this be true, then Bill
>Clinton, Gray Davis, and a bunch of others would be damned from the start.
>
>Marc
>
>msmall@infionline.net  FAX:  +540/343-7315
>Cha robh bąs fir gun ghrąs fir!
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "bdcolen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (RE: [Leica] Arnold Actions : Monday)
Message from "Jon" <jon.stanton@comcast.net> (Re: [Leica] Arnold Actions : Monday)