Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/09/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi, Mark, Audrey Hepburn was not short. IIRC, she was about 5'7" - not short for a woman. In fact, I believe her height was something of a hindrance to her aspirations of dancing ballet in a professional company. I've been in love with her for about 35 years now, since I first saw her in Roman Holiday on the late late show one summer night. I currently have an Audrey Hepburn calendar on my wall, and maybe some of those lovely photos of her were taken with a Leica (just to get things back to something artificially topical). She was the embodiment of feminine beauty and grace. I'm shocked and astonished that you used her name in the same sentence as Mr. Van Damme. Perhaps the lack of oxygen to your brain explains these egregious errors. Now that all of this has been brought to your attention, I trust that you feel the appropriate shame. If so, I forgive you in advance. ;-) cheers, frank ps: some have said that my feelings for Ms. Hepburn approach a fetish, but I think that's going a bit far, don't you? Mark Rabiner erroneously scribed: > <snip>OR Audrey Hepburn and Jean-Claude Van Damme (both short) > > I'm out of air. > > Mark Rabiner > > Portland, Oregon USA > http://www.rabinergroup.com > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- "Hell is others" - -Jean Paul Sartre - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html