Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/09/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Richard asks: <<Yes, one of the perpetual comparison question. Which one is "best" wide open at 1.4, and how soft is the Canon at 1.2? Looks like there's a Nikkor 1.4 and a Canon 1.2 for sale right now, I am somewhat tempted...>>. Most users (me included) have a love/hate relationship with the Canon 50mm F1.2. This mammoth sized optic has a screw mount but the lens is so wide that it is visible in the view finder of the camera. A 50 mm adapter is required to select the proper frame. It is soft at full aperture, but sharpens up nicely at F4. At apertures smaller than F4 it is not quite as good as the early F2 Summicrons but better than the 50mm Elmar. At F1.2 it gives a mysterious quality to the image, a sharp core with a soft halo. In short, it is a bokeh lover's delight. It takes very flattering low light portraits and makes an excellent natural light wedding lens since everyone looks beautiful. Available light photos, for which this lens was intended tend to be very contrasty and the full opening softness is suitable. It is a BIG hunk of glass to hang on your camera and it is impressive as hell mounted on an M3. The M2, M4, and .72 viewfinder M6 have marginal RF equivalent baseline to critically focus this lens at short distances (under 2 meters) but it can be done if you are careful. The lens works well on screwmount Leicas, however. For a while these lenses were cheap, in the $200 range but the prices seem to be climbing. I wholeheartedly recommend the Canon F1.2 as a specialty lens which merges the capabilities of the Noctilux and the Thambar. Larry Z - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html