Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/09/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Actually, I think the vast majority of reviews of novels are written by novelists. And no, one doesn't have to be a photographer to review photos - but one sure as heck should really know something about photography - and as others have suggested, being able to produce reasonably high quality photos is a step in that direction. - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Dan C Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 10:04 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] LUG FOOLS - Wonderful LUG Surely someone doesn't have to be a photographer in order to be a photo critic! Are movie reviews made by movie directors? Are book reviews written by novelists? dan c. At 08:31 PM 10-09-03 -0700, Sonny Carter wrote: > [snip] >If someone crits my pix and I've never seen their work, then it is >meaningless to me. If Nathan, or Kyle or Ted or SL, or Graham just to >name a short list trashes my shot, I know it is trash. > [snip] - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html