Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/09/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Carrying more than body has certainly many advantages. I wonder if somebody thought of the particular one that is documented in the pictures that are under this http://www.unizh.ch/biostat/People/schuller/vanity1.html link. Of course it could end in an endless progression ... J >From: Mike Quinn <mlquinn.mail@earthlink.net> >Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> >Subject: Re: [Leica] A second M body? >Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 19:25:00 -0700 > >Exactly what I carry.... > >Two M bodies are much better than one. >(But three are sometimes better than two). > >It's good to have another body when the film in the first runs out. > >Mike Quinn > >Jerry Lehrer wrote: > > > Even with the same film in both, I keep a 35mm lens on one body, > > and a choice of 21, 50 or 90mm on the other. > >-- >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html _________________________________________________________________ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html