Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/09/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] A second M body?
From: Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 13:15:47 -0700
References: <Law15-F65vqFjLmIJOw00046392@hotmail.com> <3F5CD2A7.2070703@wanadoo.nl>

Michiel

Even with the same film in both, I keep a 35mm lens on one body,
and a choice of 21, 50 or 90mm on the other.

Jerry

Michiel Fokkema wrote:

> I used to use a second body for another type of film. But now that I
> have a scanner, and we can easily convert color to B&W I don't need it
> anymore and lend it to my father in law.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Michiel Fokkema
>
> jan schuller wrote:
>
> > Is a second M body & lens useful?
> > I think: Yes
> > http://www.unizh.ch/biostat/People/schuller/vanity1.html
> >
> > Jan
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8.
> > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> >
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "jan schuller" <janschuller@hotmail.com> ([Leica] A second M body?)
Message from Michiel Fokkema <michiel.fokkema@wanadoo.nl> (Re: [Leica] A second M body?)