Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/09/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In a message dated 9/6/03 9:51:49 PM, pklein@2alpha.net writes: << Again, all due respect to those of you that have done such nice work with the LC5 or Digilux 1. Note that the Digilux has less aggressive image processing, which may mitigate some of the issues I've raised here. It's also possible that the LC5 has wide sample variation, and I just got a bad one. However, also note that many user comments and reviews raise the same issues I have. I'm just reporting what I observed for the benefit of the rest of the LUG. Your mileage may vary. >> - ----------------------------------------------------- Do we have a proam digital that we could use as yardstick of performance: Nikon D100? Canon 10D? Olympus E1? br - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html