Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/09/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]If you think that the old Life Magazine wasn't full of 'coded messages' in its photojournalism, I'd suggest you go spend some time in the library.;-) Actually, I'd suggest that for anyone with half-a-brain, or for anyone paying any attention - with or without at least half-a-brain - the attempts at manipulation are generally more obvious today than they ever were in the past. B. D. - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Saganich, Christopher/Medical Physics Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 5:05 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: RE: [Leica] PHOTOGRAPHY; PHOTOGRAPHERS; Leicas The difference isn't in the medium, (digital or traditional), rather delivery and consumption of images. The image no longer has value as the end product, the value lies in its ability to be consumed by the masses and carry a specific message. The message isn't the usual heroic realism, but, generally fear, violence, and perversion masked as apple pie, security, and desire. The average person is exposed to a staggering volume of purposely coded imagery compared to what we may call traditional photojournalism, at least in the States. Europe seems a little more balanced in this regard. Chris Saganich - -----Original Message----- From: jrhedger@pdq.net [mailto:jrhedger@pdq.net] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 3:40 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] PHOTOGRAPHY; PHOTOGRAPHERS; Leicas I have had enough you are full of shite. Digital has contributed no more than photography or lying writers. In photography it just made it quicker and easier. Stop it. Jim On 9/5/03 1:59 PM, "Afterswift@aol.com" <Afterswift@aol.com> wrote: > > In a message dated 9/5/03 10:35:19 AM, bdcolen@earthlink.net writes: > > << digital technology has worsened the picture by making it very easy > to further blur the distinctions between the reporting, and > government-spin, entertainment-advertising media > > HOW? >> > -------------------------------------------------------------- > By modifying normal stock images to sell products in magazines. The > same thing is done in government report illustrations and it's rampant > in advertising and entertainment. Just look at the posters and the > card ads on buses, etc. There isn't an untouched up photo in any of > those venues. There's a promo shot obviously enhanced of a buxom > working girl that is used in the Times to push retirement stocks. > Digital editing is used all over the place -- including even > on the LUG. I attribute that form of modification to mostly make an image > clearer on our monitors. > > br > > -- > To unsubscribe, see > http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html ===================================================================== Please note that this e-mail and any files transmitted with it may be privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this communication or any of its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message and deleting this message, any attachments, and all copies and backups from your computer. - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html