Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/09/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]- -----Original Message----- From: Mark Pope <leica.user@ntlworld.com> >why would you need and XPAN as well as 2 M bodies and an R body (with >lenses?). This seems like overkill to me, not just in terms of space but >also weight. It sounds like you will be humping this stuff around all day, >so any weight saving will be appreciated. No, no, no. I said: 2 M's Xpan or 2M's R 6.2 (maybe) >The XPAN is a rangefinder so could double-up as an M substitute and give you >the panoramic option (which will burn more film BTW). True, but if the M is going to be my main body, I would like one backup. Feli >Mark Pope >Swindon Wilts, UK - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Feli di Giorgio * feli2@earthlink.net - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html