Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Re: Leica 90mm f/4.0 Elmar C prices
From: Karen Nakamura <mail@gpsy.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 08:17:30 -0500
References: <136.23958be7.2c7dbe47@aol.com>

>
>That's very true, but isn't it possible to design a lens system in which
>successive lens elements correct for the diffraction produced by the 
>initial small
>entry aperture. That is, the scattered light rays are recombined and
>refocused as though a wider aperture lens had been used?


If you could do this, you'd most probably get a Nobel prize in 
physics as well as a gazillion dollars from Nikon, Canon, Zeiss, 
Minolta, NASA, and Leica. Diffraction limitations are one of the most 
intractable problems for camera lens design.

There is a rumor that in the 1950s, an inventor in NJ actually solved 
diffraction limitation for lenses > 30,000mm in length, but the next 
day the agency-soon-to-be-named-the-NSA swooped him up and put him in 
the same secret facility in Arizona with the guy who invented the 500 
mpg carburetor.

KN

- -- 
Karen Nakamura
http://www.photoethnography.com/ClassicCameras/
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Afterswift@aol.com (Re: [Leica] Re: Re: Leica 90mm f/4.0 Elmar C prices)