Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2003/08/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re:Glass vs. Glassless Neg. Carriers...
From: tripspud <tripspud@transbay.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 20:38:19 -0700
References: <BCEKKGNGDPMOIPMEJONBGECKCJAA.phong@doan-ltd.com> <002d01c368a3$cc3aa820$db249d18@jimyuk06mzqas1> <3F460C79.D4AF2BB9@transbay.net> <48AEDE75.4FCDD76E@hale-pohaku.com> <01b001c368c8$0c6e50d0$6401a8c0@lan.artvader.com> <48B0AF4A.B437895B@hale-pohaku.com> <005101c369ec$79dcaed0$6401a8c0@lan.artvader.com>
Hi Jon!
I've just received and setup my Focomat 1a. I haven't
set the autofocus yet and the easel is still in question but it's
a beautiful piece of enginering resulting in a practical tool
for printing.
Cheers,
Rich Lahrson
Berkeley, California
tripspud@transbay.net
> Actually I have not done my own processing in about 30 years. I have however
> just acquired a Focomat enlarger, so I will be back at it. The Hepa is
> primarily for airborne allergens. The visible airborne dust disappears.
> Jon
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies:
Reply from "Jon" <jon.stanton@comcast.net> (Re: [Leica] Re:Glass vs. Glassless Neg. Carriers...)
In reply to:
Message from "Phong" <phong@doan-ltd.com> (RE: [Leica] New PAWs (2 images))
Message from "Jim McIntyre" <mcintyre@ca.inter.net> (Re: [Leica] New PAWs (2 images))
Message from tripspud <tripspud@transbay.net> ([Leica] Re:Glass vs. Glassless Neg. Carriers...)
Message from Dennis Painter <dennis@hale-pohaku.com> (Re: [Leica] Re:Glass vs. Glassless Neg. Carriers...)
Message from "Jon" <jon.stanton@comcast.net> (Re: [Leica] Re:Glass vs. Glassless Neg. Carriers...)
Message from Dennis Painter <dennis@hale-pohaku.com> (Re: [Leica] Re:Glass vs. Glassless Neg. Carriers...)
Message from "Jon" <jon.stanton@comcast.net> (Re: [Leica] Re:Glass vs. Glassless Neg. Carriers...)