Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Digilux?
From: Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 14:59:36 -0700
References: <BB6D2988.10BB6%telyt@earthlink.net>

Doug

Seems to me that all the M Leicas came from one factory or another
that had "E. Leitz" or "Leica" on it. I really dunno what's on the R
factory in Portugal, I've never visited that one.

Good enough for me.

Jerry

Doug Herr wrote:

> on 8/23/03 11:23 AM, Jerry Lehrer at jerryleh@pacbell.net wrote:
>
> > Sonny
> >
> > Sounds just like the arguments we had in the Porsche world about
> > the "Porsche" 914, 924, and 944.  My position was/ is "If it wasn't
> > made in the Porsche factory, it isn't a Porsche"  Do you have any
> > problem with that?
> >
> > Jerry
> >
>
> If what you want is a "real" Leica, some say there are none newer than the
> IIIg.  Others say the M3 was the last "real" Leica, others say the M4 was
> the last.  What does all this mean to the rest of us?  It means opinions
> vary, pick the one you like, and enjoy it no matter what else has the Red
> Dot on it.
> [SARCASM]
> As everyone knows, anything with a Red Dot isn't a Real Leica.
> [/SARCASM]
> Now go make some pictures.  The pictures are what make your camera real.
>
> Doug Herr
> Birdman of Sacramento
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Doug Herr <telyt@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] Digilux?)