Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2003/08/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: No digital comments?
From: Daniel Ridings <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 20:49:23 +0200 (MEST)
References: <3F3BA00A.FE83DA16@rabinergroup.com> <fb.44d07f24.2c6c0058@aol.com> <p05111019bb6138100f50@[192.168.123.49]> <5.1.1.6.0.20030814112051.00b9f630@mail.horizon.bc.ca>
> Absitively and Posilutely! :)
Boy, let's see if Jerry still agrees with everything David says. He's
probably got his nose buried in a dictionary right now :)
> I don't think there's anything wrong with digital being discussed/shown
> here... providing it has some Leica connection.
Sounds like we're arriving at Alastair's criteria for FOM2. Not so bad.
Daniel
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
In reply to:
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> (Re: [Leica] No digital comments?)
Message from Afterswift@aol.com (Re: [Leica] No digital comments?)
Message from Karen Nakamura <mail@gpsy.com> (Re: [Leica] No digital comments?)
Message from David Young <dnr@horizon.bc.ca> ([Leica] Re: No digital comments?)