Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] High Speed Ektachrome (was: Re: Xtol)
From: Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 06:59:33 -0700
References: <BB6065C9.106DC%telyt@earthlink.net> <Pine.SOL.4.56-L.0308140738410.17358@hedvig.uio.no>

At 7:39 AM +0200 8/14/03, Daniel Ridings wrote:
>I was going to say 16.
>
>On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Doug Herr wrote:
>
>>
>>  > I actually shot a roll of Kodachrome tungsten once who remembers that ASA
>>  > The Sixty-four thousand dollar question....
>>  > I think it was 80 but it might have been 40.
>>  > I'll stick at 40 the film was around before K64 was even invented!
>>
>>  I'll go with 40
>>
>>  Doug Herr
>>  Birdman of Sacramento
>  > http://www.wildlightphoto.com

When Kodachrome was ASA 10, the tungsten was 16; when KII came out at 
ASA 25, tungsten was 40.

- -- 
    *            Henning J. Wulff
   /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
  /###\   mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
  |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> (Re: [Leica] High Speed Ektachrome (was: Re: Xtol))
In reply to: Message from Doug Herr <telyt@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] High Speed Ektachrome (was: Re: Xtol))
Message from Daniel Ridings <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no> (Re: [Leica] High Speed Ektachrome (was: Re: Xtol))