Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Second Thoughts on a Leica Second Body
From: Nathan Wajsman <n.wajsman@chello.nl>
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 16:15:48 +0200
References: <001101c35ed3$af942d60$3e23fea9@ccasony01>

BD,

This discussion just shows that we all have different tastes. I am extremely
pleased with the CL and the 40mm and 90mm lenses I have for it. No, it is
will not replace my M outfit, but it does supplement it nicely, and I do not
feel that I have to compromise the way I take pictures in order to use it. I
did feel that way when I owned a IIIf, which is why I got rid of it after a
few months.

Nathan

bdcolen wrote:

> "The kind of camera that makes the photographer conform to it."
>
> What a perfect definition for an imperfect camera.
> Cameras are tools with which photographers craft images. The tool should
> suit the photographer's working style and needs; the photographer should
> not have to adapt his or her working style and needs to the tool.

- --
Nathan Wajsman
Almere, The Netherlands

e-mail: n.wajsman@chello.nl
Mobile: +31 630 868 671

Photo site: http://www.wajsmanphoto.com


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "bdcolen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (RE: [Leica] Second Thoughts on a Leica Second Body)