Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]BD Your statement on conformity is correct. I would hate to be constrained to the arbitrary limits of an essentially useless camera. Jerry bdcolen wrote: > "The kind of camera that makes the photographer conform to it." > > What a perfect definition for an imperfect camera. > Cameras are tools with which photographers craft images. The tool should > suit the photographer's working style and needs; the photographer should > not have to adapt his or her working style and needs to the tool. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of > Afterswift@aol.com > Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 4:39 PM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: Re: [Leica] Second Thoughts on a Leica Second Body > > In a message dated 8/9/03 1:30:53 PM Pacific Daylight Time, > buzz.hausner@verizon.net writes: > > > Obviously, Brrrrr, you are a REAL LEICA PHOTOGRAPHER, so enjoy your > > CL. As you'll note in my original message, I said that many people > > love CLs, obviously you are one of them. > > > > Buzz Hausner > ------------------------------- > Buzz, > > To each his own. We have contrasting views on the CL. To me it has > always > served well as a second body. It takes up very little space, but can hit > images > out of the ball park. Sure, it's delicate compared to an M. Some care is > > required. It's the type of camera that makes the photographer conform to > it. I found > the tradeoff worth the results. > > br > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html