Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Ernie
That is correct, the hood was facing the lens and not out where it would
shade/protect the front of the lens.
Gene
Ernest Nitka
<enitka@twcny.rr.com> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Sent by: cc:
owner-leica-users@mejac.palo Subject: Re: [Leica] Ted vs "lag time"
-alto.ca.us
08/07/2003 10:08 AM
Please respond to
leica-users
Gene - do I have this correct - they had the hood basically facing
backwards so that it did not extend out beyond the end of the lens?
whoa - how bizarre is that.
ernie
On Thursday, August 7, 2003, at 10:34 AM, grduprey@rockwellcollins.com
wrote:
>
> The thought of photogs "Dumbing Down" brings up an observation I made
> while
> in Indianapolis this past weekend:
>
> While at the Brickyard 400 last weekend, I noticed all these people
> with
> their Nikon/Canon AF and Digital Motor Driven SLRS shooting with the
> Lens
> Hoods turned around protecting/shading the Lens Bodies. It would seem
> no
> one has told them what the lens hood is for. Maybe it is a status or
> fashion thing...
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html