Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Lists (WAS: squabbling over digitial vs. film.)
From: Nathan Wajsman <n.wajsman@chello.nl>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 07:21:45 +0200
References: <000d01c35b87$0e16e580$210110ac@DJPFL111>

I use Leica M, CL and R. One of the things I have always loved about the LUG is
that I can ask any question about any of the three systems and get informed
answers. I would hate to see the list split into sublists corresponding to the
different Leica flavours. Even though digital capture is not in my future
(unless film really disappears), I find the discussion interesting and when I do
not, I can always delete the threads without reading the posts. So please, let
us keep the LUG together, just the way it is.

Nathan

Clive Moss wrote:

> The tendency of lists to bifurcate and specialize is an annoyance. We could
> end up with an M-Titanium list, a black-enamel-M list, a chrome-M list, not
> to mention specialization by whatever your preferred viewfinder
> magnification is. If this list really concentrated on "what M Leicas do
> best" and stayed on topic, traffic would drop to almost zero, and most of
> that boring. Check the archives. The best list for "what M Leicas do best"
> is John Brownlow's Street Photography list -- and they rarely talk about the
> cameras over there.
> --

- --
Nathan Wajsman
Almere, The Netherlands

e-mail: n.wajsman@chello.nl
Mobile: +31 630 868 671

Photo site: http://www.wajsmanphoto.com


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Clive Moss" <chmphoto@sbcglobal.net> (RE: [Leica] squabbling over digitial vs. film.)