Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Staying w/ film for a while - handled a D100 (and a 10D, and...)
From: Rei Shinozuka <shino@panix.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 18:07:59 -0400
References: <51.32e4563c.2c6023c9@aol.com> <007001c35acd$b0e74d50$3e23fea9@ccasony01>

i recall the number 16 milliseconds being bandied about, but
i cannot attest to its veracity.

- -rei

On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 05:16:37PM -0400, bdcolen wrote:
> Certainly the battery dependence is a defense, but a pretty meaningless
> difference given how easy it is to carry extra batteries and change them
> regularly. The shutter lag, and write time, however,  very real issues.
> Of course the new Nikon D2H is reported to have a shutter lag of 37
> miliseconds,which I believe makes it faster in that regard than the F5.
> What's the shutter lag on the M3?
> 

- -- 
Rei Shinozuka shino@panix.com
Ridgewood, New Jersey

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Afterswift@aol.com (Re: [Leica] Staying w/ film for a while - handled a D100 (and a 10D, and...))
Message from "bdcolen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (RE: [Leica] Staying w/ film for a while - handled a D100 (and a 10D, and...))