Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Staying w/ film for a while - handled a D100 (and a 10D, and...)
From: "bdcolen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 11:30:18 -0400

That doesn't answer the question - other than to acknowledge that those
people are doing "real photography" with digital cameras. 

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of
Afterswift@aol.com
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 11:23 AM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] Staying w/ film for a while - handled a D100 (and a
10D, and...)



In a message dated 8/4/03 7:19:17 AM, bdcolen@earthlink.net writes:

<< And what, pray tell, is "real photography?" Is it James Nachtwey's
photography done inside Baghdad while the bombs fell? Is it virtually
all the images we see in our daily newspapers and most of what we now
see in news magazines? Or is it the photos people post here of their
kids and their kids friends? What is "real photography?" And why does
the particular camera used make it more real?

Just wondering. :-)

B. D. >>
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
- ------
- -----
BD,

If it weren't for a few photographers out there who are using film,
there 
would be no cross-reference for what actually happened. I have no doubt
that even 
those shooting digital have film Nikons or Leicas that they use as
backup.

br 
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html