Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]That doesn't answer the question - other than to acknowledge that those people are doing "real photography" with digital cameras. - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Afterswift@aol.com Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 11:23 AM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] Staying w/ film for a while - handled a D100 (and a 10D, and...) In a message dated 8/4/03 7:19:17 AM, bdcolen@earthlink.net writes: << And what, pray tell, is "real photography?" Is it James Nachtwey's photography done inside Baghdad while the bombs fell? Is it virtually all the images we see in our daily newspapers and most of what we now see in news magazines? Or is it the photos people post here of their kids and their kids friends? What is "real photography?" And why does the particular camera used make it more real? Just wondering. :-) B. D. >> - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - ------ - ----- BD, If it weren't for a few photographers out there who are using film, there would be no cross-reference for what actually happened. I have no doubt that even those shooting digital have film Nikons or Leicas that they use as backup. br - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html