Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] MP vs. M7
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2003 07:21:36 -0700
References: <200308022213.PAA07547@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> <0111F43D-C57D-11D7-9B46-000393C0DD28@mac.com> <20030803123337.GA13550@panix.com>

Rei Shinozuka wrote:
> 
> IIIB?  then it's gotta be the MP.
> 
> -rei
> 
> On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 11:37:50PM -0700, liz boeder wrote:
> >
> > Thanks so much to everybody. Coming from shooting a Leica IIIB and a
> > Rollei SL66E, I felt I might not have enough experience with modern

Liz such a cool combination the Rollei SL66E and IIIB is the SL66E for
those who don't know a smarter, wiser, gentler, better Hasselblad which
really comes in handy for close in work.
I'd say an equally cool combo would be a twin lens Rollei (quieter than
a Leica and in many ways less intrusive) and a Leicaflex with the 60
macro on it for a starter. Not that you'd not want a MP. I sure do.
And a Viso for your MP! (great for headshots of gnats, but you need the
bellows I almost forgot)

Mark Rabiner
Portland, Oregon USA
http://www.rabinergroup.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "Robert VanLane" <robert@actv.ne.jp> ([Leica] ITOOY + Summar = OK?????)
In reply to: Message from liz boeder <lizlizliz@mac.com> ([Leica] MP vs. M7)
Message from Rei Shinozuka <shino@panix.com> (Re: [Leica] MP vs. M7)