Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Min Luna-Pro didn't take a dive (it's about 30 years old). I just thought it was getting a little dirty under the various sliding disks. I replaced it with 1) Digisix and then 2) Digiflash. It became a one - two story because the Digisix/flash is so nice you'll never go anywhere without it. Small, accurate, quick ... small, small, small. YOu won't even notice when it falls out or you put it down and walk away from it. I lost mine during vacation. It appears that the Digiflash (can meter flash too) replaced the Digisix. I get the same readings as my Luna-Pro. It has incident and reflected modes (I use almost exclusively incident mode). Sorry, no spot attachment. But the angle it reads is narrower than the Luna-Pro without the spot attachment. It's rugged, probably more rugged than the Luna-Pro since it is digital with no moving needles to get thrown off whack. But it's funny. These things always give you the same reading in the same kind of light. :) Daniel On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Jack McLain wrote: > My (very) old Luna-Pro seems to have taken a dive. It's time to get another > meter and it's been ages since I even thought about light meters and I am > clueless about what is out there. > > What are y'all using? Why? > > I want something rugged. small, and I dont need flash function, but would > like ideally to use a meter with a spot attachment. > cheers > > Jack McLain > Tucson, AZ > http://jackmclain-photography.dotcommunity.net > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html