Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/07/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> Hi Chandos: > > What I meant to say was that the M4-P and M4-2 were not the equal in build > of the M4. That is not my experience as I have not ever owned or used > either. My comment was based upon information provided byg experienced LHSA > people who had used both extensively. In fact, I believe Roy Moss, past > President and former editor-in-chief of VIEWFINDER wrote an article > detailing the ways in which they both fell short of the M4. > > Seth LaK 9 > ...yeah, but Seth, Roy was notoriously conservative in any tolerance towards change with Leica models. Personnaly I have M2s, M3, M6TTLs and they are equally well made IMHO. Some people have complained that the M6 has some plastic parts compared to the M2/3/4 metal parts -- plastic? so what? There are plastic parts on the space shuttle and the Corvette body is plastic. Regards, sl - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html