Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/07/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Subject: Re: [Leica] MP's tp plate > > The way things look verses the way they perform is an issue that has > gone by me a few times this month. > > An example in mind is the lenses for the Contax RTS and the whole > "Contax" SLR system's AF and otherwise. > All painted numbers. Zeiss glass made in Japan. Bad combination. > The lenses look like Vivitar's of decades gone by. They sure as hell > don't look like Hasselblad or Rolleiflex 600 x glass. > The glass are Zeiss designs which I'm sure are executed excellently. (An > excellent execution!) > Mark Rabiner I owned and used Contax SLR for over 20 years and the build quality of the lenses is outstanding, (and better than some of the new M glass I bought earlier this year). Zeiss/Contax made a conscious decision to be a little more mass market than Leica and make the glass affordable to folks other than to the economic elite. From an optical standpoint Contax lenses are equal or better than their Leica counterparts (often at a fraction of the cost) until the latest round of ASPH glass from Leica (Contax no longer designs new glass for the RTS system). I got out of the Contax SLR system because of a bad back---those heavy lenses and bodies and their tremendous build quality were too much for me to carry any more. It's dilettantes like you that give Leica a bad name. If you think engraving on a lens or a camera makes you a better shooter, well, I don't need to add anything to your comment for anybody to see what a goddamn fool you are. And as they say, "a fool and his money are soon parted..." Gary - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html