Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/07/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Sunglasses WAS Hats?
From: Kevin H <kevin@2image.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 01:19:59 -0400
References: <77BE740C-BD38-11D7-8CEB-000393AC0E1A@johnbrownlow.com> <3F1F37AD.614FBB7F@rabinergroup.com>

My local Costco carries Maui Jims at about 45% off retail  (about $90). 
 The pairs I have are also polarized.  Curious about the UV  bit -- hard 
to believe they reflect more UV than normal sunglasses, or direct more 
UV than no protection. Time for a google search . . .

Kev

Mark Rabiner wrote:

>Johnny Deadman wrote:
>  
>
>> Maui Jims   . . . .
>>have a wonderful anti-reflection coating on the back of the lens . . . 
>>
>>        http://www.mauijim.com
>>
>But I thought I read that they will reflect enough UV right back into
>your eye which is opened up because of the sunglasses.
>Then it's cataract city. Your eyes are better off dilated. You get that
>with no glasses but yet the hat.
>Remember that 
>	you need a hat
>I'm getting fat.
>
>
>Mark Rabiner
>Portland, Oregon USA
>http://www.rabinergroup.com
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
>.
>
>  
>


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Johnny Deadman <lists@johnbrownlow.com> ([Leica] Sunglasses WAS Hats?)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> (Re: [Leica] Sunglasses WAS Hats?)