Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/07/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Ted, this means kodak has put too much weight on their film/paper business and in this day and age this is the wrong choice. - --------------------------------------------------- regards, mehrdad - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Ted Bayer Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 4:26 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] Kodak to cut up to 6,000 jobs Hi Mehrdad: Interesting point-of-view. I hadn't considered that. The lead item in the article was pointing towards loss of revenues from the sale of film and paper. Ted - ----- Original Message ----- From: "mehrdad-(kiakki.net)" <msadat@kiakki.net> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 2:23 PM Subject: RE: [Leica] Kodak to cut up to 6,000 jobs > Ted, this has nothing to do with film vs. digital. This is gross > mismanagement, lack of leadership and a complete lack of vision. > > --------------------------------------------------- > regards, mehrdad > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Ted > Bayer > Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 1:43 PM > To: LUG > Subject: [Leica] Kodak to cut up to 6,000 jobs > > > > Seems like every day we see postings about film vs. digital and the > impact on film's future. > > Here, in case anyone is interested, is an article from today relating > to that issue. > > http://www.msnbc.com/news/942906.asp?0dm=C18LB > > Ted > > > -- > To unsubscribe, see > http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > > -- > To unsubscribe, see > http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html