Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/07/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] M6 Titanium or Titanized?
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 22:50:52 -0700
References: <8384019C-BCB9-11D7-8E7E-00039354861E@attinasi.org>

Marc Attinasi wrote:
> 
> It's not a marketing ploy, it's a great finish. A Titanium top plate
> would be less appealing, really. I had one on my Olympus and it is
> ugly. Apparently getting paint to stick to titanium is difficult or
> impossible, and the raw titanium is not that pretty.
> 
> I wonder if Luxus owners believe that their cameras are solid gold? ;-)
> 
> Personally, I'm saving for a titanium M6, I think they look swell, and
> they probably work really well too.
> 
> - marc
> 

I thought these cameras "weighed in" lighter than the regular model.


Mark Rabiner
Portland, Oregon USA
http://www.rabinergroup.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Seth Rosner <sethrosner@direcway.com> (Re: [Leica] M6 Titanium or Titanized?)
In reply to: Message from Marc Attinasi <marc@attinasi.org> (Re: [Leica] M6 Titanium or Titanized?)