Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/07/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] M6 Titanium or Titanized?
From: "Jack Herron" <jherron@theriver.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 20:51:45 -0700
References: <8384019C-BCB9-11D7-8E7E-00039354861E@attinasi.org> <p06001a00bb43afdca797@[10.0.1.52]>

It's two in one!
It's a great finish, 
and
A marketing ploy!
Jack Herron
8118 E. 20th St.
Tucson, AZ 85710
520 885-6933
- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Allen Graves" <ahgraves@prodigy.net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 8:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] M6 Titanium or Titanized?


> I agree with you totally- by marketing ploy, I just meant the 
> language in the brochures that lead people to believe that the top 
> plates were truly titanium-harder, lighter, more rigid and more 
> durable- not just a normal top plate with an exceptionally durable 
> and attractive finish.
> 
> Allen
> 
> 
> 
> >It's not a marketing ploy, it's a great finish. A Titanium top plate 
> >would be less appealing, really. I had one on my Olympus and it is 
> >ugly. Apparently getting paint to stick to titanium is difficult or 
> >impossible, and the raw titanium is not that pretty.
> >
> >I wonder if Luxus owners believe that their cameras are solid gold? ;-)
> >
> >Personally, I'm saving for a titanium M6, I think they look swell, 
> >and they probably work really well too.
> >
> >- marc
> >
> >On Tuesday, July 22, 2003, at 07:40 PM, Allen Graves wrote:
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> 

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Marc Attinasi <marc@attinasi.org> (Re: [Leica] M6 Titanium or Titanized?)
Message from Allen Graves <ahgraves@prodigy.net> (Re: [Leica] M6 Titanium or Titanized?)