Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/07/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: Re: [Leica] Voightlander lenses
From: "Richard F. Man" <richard@imagecraft.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 16:43:45 -0700
References: <5609812.1058896903548.JavaMail.nobody@rowlf.psp.pas.earthlink.net>

At 12:09 PM 7/22/2003 -0700, Ted Grant wrote:
>Hi,
>I recently acquired the C/V 35 f1.2 and it's a beauty. Cuts exposures into
>film like a razor blade with good contrast. Great for available light
>shooting or any other kind.
>...

Ted, does it really give you 1.2? Dante conjectures that due to the high 
number of internal surfaces, the light transmission may be less than it 
claims? Also, how does it compare to the Summilux ASPH? (at 1.4 and above :-) )


// richard <http://www.imagecraft.com> 
<http://www.dragonsgate.net/mailman/listinfo> 

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com> (Re: Re: [Leica] Voightlander lenses)
Reply from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> (Re: Re: [Leica] Voightlander lenses)
In reply to: Message from mak@teleport.com (Re: Re: [Leica] Voightlander lenses)