Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2003/07/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Nick Ut's Napalm girl
From: Rolfe Tessem <rolfe@ldp.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 23:41:17 -0400
References: <BB408243.2A75E%mlquinn.mail@earthlink.net> <3F1B565D.8020905@ldp.com> <3F1B5AA5.D772DAA2@sympatico.ca>
frank theriault wrote:
> I read an interview of Nick Ut, and I recall that he said that he used a Nikon.
>
> regards,
> frank
I'm sure he had a Nikon, but the perspective of that picture is (at
least to my eye) consistent with the use of a 35mm lens. Lots of guys
used a Leica for the 35mm and 50mm and a Nikon for the 105mm and 200mm.
Rolfe
- --
Rolfe Tessem | Lucky Duck Productions, Inc.
rolfe@ldp.com | 96 Morton Street
(212) 463-0029 | New York, Ny 10014
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies:
Reply from frank theriault <knarf.theriault@sympatico.ca> (Re: [Leica] Re: Nick Ut's Napalm girl)
Reply from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] Re: Nick Ut's Napalm girl)
In reply to:
Message from Mike Quinn <mlquinn.mail@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: Nick Ut's Napalm girl)
Message from Rolfe Tessem <rolfe@ldp.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Nick Ut's Napalm girl)
Message from frank theriault <knarf.theriault@sympatico.ca> (Re: [Leica] Re: Nick Ut's Napalm girl)